Starfield could not run on the ARC graphics cards, Intel is working to solve the problem

Intel admitted that the ARC Alchemist graphic processors are experiencing serious problems with starting the Starfield game from Bethesda. The company promises to release the driver’s update to the exit of the game September 5. Nevertheless, even players with early access to the opportunity to play Starfield until this moment will not be.

One of the problems is that Intel has not yet released the update of drivers with support for Starfield – unlike NVIDIA and AMD. At the same time, the game does not even start with current ARC drivers.

Users report that the executable file is launched in the background and within half an hour, while it is displayed in the task dispatcher, the file can consume up to 30 GB of system memory before either the failure or the game menu will appear. Even if the game process starts in the end, users have little time left for it.

Intel probably worked on the driver for Starfield, but he could show incorrect work due to updating the game. This is not the first time this is happening. Intel several times came across this problem in previous games.

This turns out for alpha and beta tests, the third in the prevalence of the video card were not used? Okhoretic approach to the consumer. Apparently all the efforts of programmers went to achieve 30 FPS on prefixes.

What is the proportion of blue cards on the game market?

And up to 60 on PC. For some reason it is impossible above the FPS

What is the joke ? What do you think of AMD 40 ? Or what is intel 0.001 ?

The real numbers are approximately the following:

Here are the accounting of integrasses that the AMD has, what’s intelligence. Intelligence is really not enough. Even vendors few people produce them and it seems like because of Nvidia, since they do not want intel in the video cards market

There is a stature without amd built -in?

Go nuts) someone bought them ? The guys love risk)

Not a single bug! The game is perfectly licked!

So there was no question about intel) Vidyuhi Intel is for intestines)

To write a caplist on the Internet is a sign of bad tone) this is so, for information.

Well, in general, small bugs are by the type of failure of the enemy underground, it was a robo dog, but after a second or two it appeared normally back. But in general, as I understand it, this is probably the same engine from the time of Skyrim, since the console and the team for it, well, one to one from the time of tes and 3 folish, but of course it is very modernized, therefore, the minimum of bugs since everything has long been mastered and verified

The time will save guys who have the Arkitekcher. The game is bad and not worth. The gazebo was burned out in previous games.

They still spoke about Skyrim.

I’m not a super fan of it. But, I think that even without mods, he is an order of magnitude higher than Starfield. It was necessary not to release it now and not suffer from marketing, and the game for another two years to work out. Maybe it would turn out something worthwhile, the previous. The lads hurried, oh hurried.(

Hurry up? For 7 years they riveted this, Microsoft also cannot forever wait) the game was transferred and so on where else. It would not care, the engine would not have changed over the years)

What devil is it on px 580 8 gig does not start?)

No matter how trite it sounds. But this game could, with worthy optimization, should be launched at 8 GB of RAM and Vidyuha with 4GB without problems on folk PCs as Skyrim and Follych, but since Tod put a large bolt on it, people who have top -end iron and vidyuhu say that everything is fine, And so it will do . And the bulk of the players cannot play. And while I do not hear the reasoning of the sound about the game. It should be available to many. Do you really know or are sure that the bulk of people in your cities have top -end iron on a PC . So for whom this game ? For a particularly privileged class ? Accessibility is not at the same level as in BG3 for example. That is, in my opinion, the situation with Starfield is much more deplorable than it seems . Applications about some patce that will fix the performance no. And most likely no one will change the system requirements. In fact, this game does not have in excess of realistic graphics . Recall the editor of the BG and Starfield, look at the lighting in the game, the stagnant faces of the characters, wooden models, etc., well, there are no such resources in it in the system requirements . Cyberpank was results in playing at the start . 200+ hours calmly played from the date of release . And here is a little different .

The gazebo decided as usual to pay the players and raise the ST for the sake of myself, even funny when a person streamed on a 4090 card and spit from graphics and clumsy . At 40 FPS . I think this is the game industry when you have to buy vidyuhu for $ 2000 or like that and then look at the 2010 picture . Skyrim with mods looks much more beautiful. And then hairstyles were transferred to the editor from Follych 4, I generally just awesome . It is like it’s normal to make a game for 8 years and release in this form ?

I understand there were games that are really beautiful and systemic requirements above . And here is generally disgrace

No matter how trite it sounds. But this game could, with decent optimization, is launched at 8 GB of RAM and Vidyuha with 4GB without problems on folk PCs

Like beltnant 2 with treloe.

Tod put a big bolt on this

The game gives out 30FPS at the configurations stated in the requirements. In this regard, everything is fine and the requirements are 100% corresponding to reality.

It should be available to many

Why did it happen? There are requirements for the game, follow them and there will be happiness.

Applications about some patce that will fix the performance no

But there is a cyberpunk where the developers later decided to raise the system requirements after 2 years of the game and spit in the face of everyone who bought the game for the original.

In fact, this game does not have in excess of realistic graphics

And the truth. But besides facial animations and models of the NPC, the game looks very good in all aspects. At the same time, he eats only 6GB videos on an ultra in 4K.

There are no reasons for this, they are indicated absolutely accurately.

Cyberpank was not playable on the release, there were drawdowns below 25FPS on the HBO of 1 X in 900 rubles. At the same time in Starfield and there are no such drawdowns close.

Yes, it is much better here than in a cyberpan on a release, especially in terms of bugs.

The gazebo decided as usual to pay the players and raise the ST for the sake of

It’s good that the SDPR did not tell that the game works surprisingly well. Oh, so after all.